SSCI《Journal of Enterprise Information Management》征稿: 生成式人工智能与社会
2025年09月02日
截止日期:2026/03/31 23:59
征稿期刊
Journal of Enterprise Information Management
期刊级别
IF 6.4 (JCR 2024)
SSCI
Q1 (INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE 10/166)
Q1 (MANAGEMENT 57/420)
征稿主题
Generative AI and Society: Organisational and Social Impact, Ethics and Policies
细分领域
Positive and negative impact of GenAI
How does GenAI contribute to societal upgradation? For example, it promotes social welfare, benefits the disabled and ageing population, and drives global healthcare and mobility, among others.
Why is GenAI said to augment human skills? How can it serve as an effective collaborator, advance engineering techniques such as offering automation of knowledge work, enhancing productivity, etc.? What skills are necessary to leverage this technology (Cetindamar et al., 2022)?
Why is there a need to address the sustainability aspect of GenAI? What characteristics of this technology impede sustainability? What can be probable measures to mitigate them? How does it raise serious environmental concerns?
What human issues need to be addressed to ensure that GenAI does not pose a safety concern for the users? For example, how to assess the boundary between authentic and artificial human content? How does technology have a probability of interfering with and manipulating human behaviour or affect human rights such as freedom of speech?
Orgnisational and societal impact of GenAI
Does GenAI present a paradigm in the transformation of both society and organisations, critically examining the change it brings about at the micro level (e.g., individuals), meso level (e.g., organisations and institutions), and macro level (e.g., governments and global systems)? What would be the extent of this transformation and investigating the possibility of the sustainability of this?
How does GenAI affect the norms and values and operational of organisations and society, driving cultural transformation? What can be done to manage this transformation effectively? What can be the possible consequences?
How can seminal (e.g., Innovation Resistance Theory, Disruptive Innovation Theory, Technological Determinism, Digital Divide Theory, among others) and novel theoretical frameworks be used to conceptualize and uncover the foundations of Generative AI driving organizational societal changes?
What is the perspective of different stakeholders in organisations and society towards the impact GenAI is set to make? Which stakeholders will be impacted the most? Should regulations and policies vary by different stakeholders? What needs to be done to equip these stakeholders to manage the organizational and societal changes manifested by the advent of GenAI?
Ethical impact of GenAI
Is GenAI responsible for mirroring the existing societal issues, such as promoting bias and stereotyping? What possible solutions can address these issues?
What are the different ethical concerns the technology poses to society, for example, accounting for threats to fundamental human rights and autonomy, non-discrimination, explainability, transparency, etc.?
In a bid to develop Responsible AI, what different aspects need to be included to manage ethical concerns effectively? For example, it needs to inform the Explainability of GenAI, promote fair and ethical use, etc.
What ethical issues pose a threat to human existence? For example, the rise of semi-humans which can imitate their features to the extent of not realising the boundary between artificial and authentic humans.
Policy and regulatory impact of GenAI
Why do you think there is a need to draft policies or regulatory guidelines/frameworks that can aid in the effective management of GenAI and mitigate the negative effects of this technology on society?
What role does geographical variation play in the development, penetration and impact of GenAI on society? Should policies and regulatory guidelines vary by geographical region? Will a global law/policy/regulation suffice for GenAI?
How should the policies or regulatory guidelines be developed in order to account for stakeholders’ perceptions and needs, fair and ethical use, and strike the optimal balance between negative and positive aspects of GenAI?
How do we conceptualise the policies and regulatory guidelines to ensure fair use of GenAI in society? For example, what different aspects should it include, such as impact assessment, responsible AI, legitimate use of the technology, etc.?
重要时间
Submission Deadline: 31 March 2026
推荐内容
- 北京市教育委员会组织开展2024年度北京市数字教育研究课题申报工作通知
- SSCI《Journal of Family Business Strategy》征稿: 家族企业研究的未来
- 博物馆日活动暨“慰安妇”问题研究学术工作坊
- 2021第三届民族体育文化发展论坛暨《体育文化导刊》专题研讨系列活动
- 《沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年度重大选题及征稿启事
- 中国科协办公厅关于征集“科学家精神和科学文化”出版工程选题的通知
- 《社会治理》2022年重点选题指南
- 司法部关于印发《2022年度全国司法行政系统理论研究规划课题》的通知
- 申报南通市教育改革发展战略性与政策性研究课题的通知
- 安徽省文化和旅游厅关于开展2020年度省级非物质文化遗产保护专项资金申报工作的通知
