SSCI《Journal of Enterprise Information Management》征稿: 生成式人工智能与社会
2025年09月02日
截止日期:2026/03/31 23:59
征稿期刊
Journal of Enterprise Information Management
期刊级别
IF 6.4 (JCR 2024)
SSCI
Q1 (INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE 10/166)
Q1 (MANAGEMENT 57/420)
征稿主题
Generative AI and Society: Organisational and Social Impact, Ethics and Policies
细分领域
Positive and negative impact of GenAI
How does GenAI contribute to societal upgradation? For example, it promotes social welfare, benefits the disabled and ageing population, and drives global healthcare and mobility, among others.
Why is GenAI said to augment human skills? How can it serve as an effective collaborator, advance engineering techniques such as offering automation of knowledge work, enhancing productivity, etc.? What skills are necessary to leverage this technology (Cetindamar et al., 2022)?
Why is there a need to address the sustainability aspect of GenAI? What characteristics of this technology impede sustainability? What can be probable measures to mitigate them? How does it raise serious environmental concerns?
What human issues need to be addressed to ensure that GenAI does not pose a safety concern for the users? For example, how to assess the boundary between authentic and artificial human content? How does technology have a probability of interfering with and manipulating human behaviour or affect human rights such as freedom of speech?
Orgnisational and societal impact of GenAI
Does GenAI present a paradigm in the transformation of both society and organisations, critically examining the change it brings about at the micro level (e.g., individuals), meso level (e.g., organisations and institutions), and macro level (e.g., governments and global systems)? What would be the extent of this transformation and investigating the possibility of the sustainability of this?
How does GenAI affect the norms and values and operational of organisations and society, driving cultural transformation? What can be done to manage this transformation effectively? What can be the possible consequences?
How can seminal (e.g., Innovation Resistance Theory, Disruptive Innovation Theory, Technological Determinism, Digital Divide Theory, among others) and novel theoretical frameworks be used to conceptualize and uncover the foundations of Generative AI driving organizational societal changes?
What is the perspective of different stakeholders in organisations and society towards the impact GenAI is set to make? Which stakeholders will be impacted the most? Should regulations and policies vary by different stakeholders? What needs to be done to equip these stakeholders to manage the organizational and societal changes manifested by the advent of GenAI?
Ethical impact of GenAI
Is GenAI responsible for mirroring the existing societal issues, such as promoting bias and stereotyping? What possible solutions can address these issues?
What are the different ethical concerns the technology poses to society, for example, accounting for threats to fundamental human rights and autonomy, non-discrimination, explainability, transparency, etc.?
In a bid to develop Responsible AI, what different aspects need to be included to manage ethical concerns effectively? For example, it needs to inform the Explainability of GenAI, promote fair and ethical use, etc.
What ethical issues pose a threat to human existence? For example, the rise of semi-humans which can imitate their features to the extent of not realising the boundary between artificial and authentic humans.
Policy and regulatory impact of GenAI
Why do you think there is a need to draft policies or regulatory guidelines/frameworks that can aid in the effective management of GenAI and mitigate the negative effects of this technology on society?
What role does geographical variation play in the development, penetration and impact of GenAI on society? Should policies and regulatory guidelines vary by geographical region? Will a global law/policy/regulation suffice for GenAI?
How should the policies or regulatory guidelines be developed in order to account for stakeholders’ perceptions and needs, fair and ethical use, and strike the optimal balance between negative and positive aspects of GenAI?
How do we conceptualise the policies and regulatory guidelines to ensure fair use of GenAI in society? For example, what different aspects should it include, such as impact assessment, responsible AI, legitimate use of the technology, etc.?
重要时间
Submission Deadline: 31 March 2026


推荐内容
- 关于做好甘肃省教育科学“十四五”规划2021年度课题立项申报工作的通知
- “社会建构论在中国”2019年度学术研讨会
- 浙江大学艺术与考古学院2020年博士后、学术助理等岗位招聘公告
- 2025年度汕头市社科研究课题的通知
- 《经济与管理评论》(C扩,北大核心)2021年选题方向
- 广东省哲学社会科学规划“建设粤港澳大湾区”和“支持深圳建设中国特色社会主义先行示范区”专项课题招标公告
- 2022年江西省社科基金地区项目暨景德镇经济社会发展重大研究课题招标公告
- 西安交通大学体育中心2021年3月招聘体育教师(助教)公告
- 面向全国|教育部高校思想政治工作创新发展中心(武汉东湖学院)2025年度专项研究课题通知
- C扩 | 《西藏民族大学学报》2024年重点选题方向

